Speed dating cooperative learning
The Speed (Up)Dating event aimed to allow participants to connect with colleagues, relax with a hot beverage and learn about what's new with quick and lively snapshot presentations.This was also a good opportunity to network and gather with friends before the winter break! From that spot, students take turns defending their positions.Variations: Often a Philosophical Chairs debate will be based around a text or group of texts students have read ahead of time; students are required to cite textual evidence to support their claims and usually hold the texts in their hands during the discussion.So here they are: 15 formats for structuring a class discussion to make it more engaging, more organized, more equitable, and more academically challenging.If you’ve struggled to find effective ways to develop students’ speaking and listening skills, this is your lucky day. The first batch contains the higher-prep strategies, formats that require teachers to do some planning or gathering of materials ahead of time.After some time passes, new students rotate from the seats behind the speaker into the center seats and continue the conversation.Variations: When high school English teacher Sarah Brown Wessling introduced this strategy in the featured video (click Pinwheel Discussion above), she used it as a device for talking about literature, where each group represented a different author, plus one provocateur group.
Discussion is meant to happen naturally and students do not need to raise their hands to speak.
Speed (Up)Dating provides short and snappy 3-minute updates on a wide variety of topics of interest to Mc Gill staff who support students (including, but not limited to, advising, academic, student services, student affairs and frontline staff).
In recent months, several new and enhanced resources and services that may be of interest to you in your advising or student support role have been developed.
actually meant the teacher would do most of the talking; He would throw out a couple of questions like “So what did you think about the video? ” and a few students would respond, resulting in something that like a discussion, but was ultimately just a conversation between the teacher and a handful of extroverted students; a classic case of Fisheye Teaching.
The problem wasn’t them; in most of the classrooms where they’d sat as students, that’s exactly what a class discussion looked like.